The past few weeks have been rather slow with signings and trades as the focus of most of major league baseball has been the passage of the new labor agreement. With that said, the Winter Meetings begin next Monday and we should see a sharp increase in Hot Stove activity in the coming days. This edition of “Dear NatsGM” has been taken directly from questions I have received recently from my Twitter account @NatsGMdotcom. Without further ado, here is the latest installment of “Dear NatsGM”…
@NotSlimButShady via Twitter -> @NatsGMdotcom what are your thoughts on Baseball America’s Top 10 List for the Nationals that was recently announced? Also @FelixMarsden via Twitter -> @NatsGMdotcom- To build on his Q, what Nats minor leaguer(s) are your sleepers and who do you like less than consensus?
Baseball America annually ranks each organizations top 10 prospects, and recently they announced their 2011 Nationals list, namely from 1-10, Bryce Harper, Anthony Rendon, Brad Peacock, A.J. Cole, Brian Goodwin, Alex Meyer, Matt Purke, Sammy Solis, Derek Norris, and Steve Lombardozzi. I am immediately struck by how improved the system is from 3-4 years ago, when Matt Purke likely would have been the top overall prospect, today he sits 7th. Even some of the names outside the Top 10 like Destin Hood, Robbie Ray, and Chris Marrero are promising prospects that would find themselves inside the Top 10 of many organizations, so the depth is vastly improved as well.
While this system has made tremendous improvements in the past few years, my only concern is with the “boom or bust” nature of this top 10, as each player after Bryce Harper has questions associated with him. Four of the players on this list (Rendon, Purke, Goodwin, and Meyer) have yet to play a professional game outside of the Arizona Fall League, and AJ Cole and Brad Peacock do not have especially long track records of success. That said, I am definitely nitpicking, as this system is one of the ten best in baseball and likely inching toward the Top 5, as the sheer amount of premium talent they possess cannot be ignored.
As for my sleepers in the Nationals system, the names that immediately jump out to me are Jeff Kobernus, Erick Fernandez and to a lesser extent, Destin Hood. I have long been a believer in Jeff Kobernus since I scouted him for a week in Cape Cod a few summers ago (thank you Dannhauser family) as a 15-20 home run and 20 stolen base type player with solid-to plus defense at 3B, whom also possessed the athleticism to play second base as well. The power I saw a few summers ago has yet to appear as a pro, but the speed has certainly translated and he made nice strides in 2011.
Erick Fernandez was a 2011 25th round pick as a catcher out of Georgetown; Erick has long been a personal favorite of mine, as I have watched him play probably 25+ collegiate games and I believe he can develop into a backup major league catcher, as he has wonderful defensive and leadership skills, along with a surprisingly quick bat. Fernandez is a player to keep an eye on in 2012.
Finally, Destin Hood is difficult to label a sleeper, as he has been placed on other top prospect lists from other baseball outlets, but I am a big believer in Hood’s talent, athleticism and bat. He will continue to move slowly through the minors, but in time I think he develops into a Josh Willingham-type player in left field.
I do not wish to sound negative, but a couple players I am less high on than the organization are Brad Peacock and Robbie Ray. I like Peacock as a quality major league pitcher, but his changeup has not developed enough in recent years for me to believe it will be an effective major league pitch. Since I do not believe in the changeup, I think Peacock is destined to be a strong late-inning reliever, rather than a middle-of-the-rotation pitcher. Thus, I would attempt to sell high on him this winter to a team that believes in him as a long-term starting pitcher. Robbie Ray is a quality left-handed pitching prospect who showed success last season at Low-A Hagerstown, producing a 3.13 ERA and 95 strikeouts in 89 innings. I am not down on him as a prospect, I would prefer to say that I think his numbers are more impressive than his stuff. With an 87-90mph fastball, I fear that he will struggle at the Double-A level unless he gains some velocity on his fastball. That said, he is only 19 years old and has a slender frame so the potential is there to add strength and velocity in the next few seasons. Ray is a solid prospect, but perhaps not quite as strong as his performance might suggest.
Thank you for following me on Twitter and thanks for your question!
@NL_Beast via Twitter -> @NatsGMdotcom If given the choice this winter, do you prefer to sign Prince Fielder or Albert Pujols? This feels like a “Dear NatsGM” question-
tadalafil 20mg uk Even sometimes due to ED, marriages are also affected. The number of sufferers those who have been attacked by heart diseases, recent heart stroke, congestive heart failure, variable blood pressure level, seizure, bleeding disorder, blood cell disorder, vision loss, hearing disorder, hypertensive disorder or heart diseases should be scrutinized to ensure the safe consumption of cialis from canadian pharmacy. Test tube baby may represent a possible solution in this case and confident enough that above mentioned causes order levitra online http://twomeyautoworks.com/item-5437 are not your case. However, emergence viagra sans prescription of side effects does not actually depend on the texture of the medicine last for about 4 to 6 hours and in cases more than 6 hours. Thanks for the question, and before I begin, your Twitter handle is outstanding! With this question, there are several things we know both positively and negatively about Prince Fielder and Albert Pujols: both are first basemen and two of the best 10 players in baseball, have long and distinct track records of success, and are MVP level talents. Also, both players will rightly command enormous contracts as Pujols is rumored to be demanding an 8 or 9 year contract worth more than $200 million dollars, and Fielder is angling to match or exceed Mark Teixeira’s free agent contract of 8-years and $180 million dollars. Besides the enormous financial commitment, there have long been questions about the accuracy of Pujols’ reported age of 31 and giving someone over the age of 30 a 9-year contract seems like a terrible investment. Prince Fielder has the advantage of being only 27 and theoretically entering his prime, but his round frame and bad body profile does not project to age particularly well.
Both Prince Fielder and Albert Pujols would be enormous upgrades to the Nationals lineup, and if GM Mike Rizzo could find a way to sign either one for 6 years or less, I would fully support the decision. However, I do not see either signing for fewer than seven years, and I fear the regression in the last few years of their contracts. Therefore, as appealing and talented as both players are, I would have a difficult time supporting either signing: however, if forced to choose, I would sign Pujols, as I think he is the best hitter of the past 20 years and will age like a fine California Cabernet, for the next 6-7 years anyway. Thanks for following me on Twitter, and thanks for the question!
@JamesPole via Twitter -> “@NatsGMdotcom, what advice would you give a 12 year old boy that shows real promise as a baseball player?”
Thanks for reading and this is a perfect question for “Dear NatsGM”. The first two things I immediately hear scouts and college recruiters ask about high school athletes are, “What is his GPA?” and “Is he a good young man or is he a knucklehead?” So the immediate focus in my opinion should be to shore up the off-the-field stuff.
However, I am not an expert on teaching and training youngsters, so I forwarded this question to a former teammate of mine, and former minor league pitcher Matthew Ryan. Matthew turned down scholarship offers from ACC schools to pitch locally at George Washington (his priority was academics), pitched in the Cape Cod League, and was a major league prospect. Here was his response to your question:
“First of all, Ryan is correct, focus on education above everything else. That was always my priority, and should be any young man’s as well. In terms of on field training, for a pitcher I would recommend you throw, throw and throw some more while working on your mechanics, and run a lot to strengthen your legs. Do not lift weights until you are about sixteen years old, except to strengthen your throwing arm and rotator cuff and do not throw a curveball until that age as well. For a hitter, I would say the best piece of advice I could give would be to try and learn to switch hit.”
“Year around as a kid I threw, hit off a tee, long tossed, and soft tossed, constantly working on my throwing and hitting mechanics. One piece of advice I would share is I wish I had joined the track or cross country team in high school to build up my leg strength. Another idea I would recommend is long tossing with a softball (I still do to this day) to cause muscle confusion and strengthen and spread out the rotator cuff muscle. Once you are finished tossing the softball for 20 minutes, go to a baseball for 20 minutes and it feels like a ping pong ball.”
A big thank you goes out to Matt for sharing his thoughts and expertise and thank you to @JamesPole for the question.
This “Tip of the Fedora” goes out to my long-time friend Matthew Ryan, who was kind enough to lend his expertise to the question above. He and I are working on some additional content for NatsGM this winter, so keep an eye out for his future contributions. Matthew Ryan, MA, LPC, NCC is a licensed mental health professional, with a Master in Arts in Clinical Psychology and has completed his doctoral classes in Clinical Psychology. He recently started his own private practice, Duffy Counseling Center, in McLean, VA outside of Washington, DC. He works with adolescents and adults. He focuses on depression, anxiety, learning disabilities, sports anxiety/performance, and crisis intervention. His office contact number is 703-255-1091. Thanks again, my friend!
Follow me on Twitter @NatsGMdotcom, email me your questions and comments to nationalsgm@gmail.com, and “Like” me on Facebook search NatsGM. Thank you so much!
Nice job Ryan! ’bout as good as the mainstream pundits maybe better.
But like them you lose one criteria the real GM of this franchise is focused on. And
his manager thinks its important as well … albeit so as not to offend Adam LaRoche he is not as vocal and a bit more political … surprisingly enough …
Its left-handed hitting. Its precisely why Rizzo signed La Roche after losing Adam Dunn to free agency. As a stop gap.
Sure Bryce Harper may go a long way toward addressing that … but he is a single bat. The days when you had Nick the stick and a left-handed hitting catcher named Snyder in the line up are gone. Apparently the Nats home favors left handed hitters as well.
I think that means Prince Fielder (for 4-5 years) is the #1 offensive priority for the Nationals … not CF given that Werth can more than manage the spot. If they did find a CF other than BJ Upton or Peter Borjous it almost definitely to be a left-handed hitting one like Brett Gardner of the Yankees. And not Coco Crisp. As Morgan was. As Roger Bernadina, Corey Brown, and Brian Goodwin are.
That is why for Nats management Fielder likely gets the nod over Pujols.
Looking at Nationals park factors it shows 130 triples versus 82 for right handed batters. 108 doubles versus 95 for right handed batters, 101 singles versus 98 for right handed batters … but home runs were 94 versus 100 for right handed batters. wOBA was 103 for left handed batters versus 97 for right handed batters.
Fielder does appear to alternate years iso-wise … but a ball park that favors left handed hitters might be just what the doctor ordered.
And YET ANOTHER reason why Bryce Harper will likely start the year in the majors on the 25+1 even if its mostly on the bench next to Davey Johnson initially.
Peric,
As I have stated, I am not nearly as concerned about all the right-handed bats as you are (and the club seems to, as you point out)… sure I would prefer to have it 50-50, but I would be far more concerned if we had 6-7 lefty bats. Just a difference of opinion or philosophy. And I answered the question more if I was running a baseball team and had choice A or choice B, not whom I would sign for the Nats. Fielder is a much better fit than Pujols because of age, smaller contract, and the lefty bat like you point out, but his father fell off a cliff as a hitter at age 27, and I can think of few if any players with such weight that have succeeded well into their 30s. Makes me very nervous, as the odds of him being worth his contract are not particularly high.
As always Peric, your insights make me a better writer, thanks for sharing your opinions and insights.
Let’s look at this a little more deeply.
We’ll use park adjusted weighted on-bat-average or wOBA plus batting runs above average taken by RV/PA times the number of plate appearances showing the top
Nats hitters along with Fielder and Pujols and just as a point of comparison Lance
Berkman.
wOBA bRAA w/OBA bRAA
Prince Fielder .407 49.9 Albert Pujols .405 46.7
Michael Morse .393 36.3 Lance Berkman .426 52.0
Ryan Zimmerman .360 15.2
Wilson Ramos .345 9.4
Jayson Werth .332 6.5
Danny Espinosa .331 6.1
Laynce Nix .332 3.6
I don’t know about you but these stats better reflect what we were seeing this past season versus the tradition BA/OBP/OPS I think you’ll agree that those were in fact
the best Nats hitters this past season.
Look at the disparity between the top hitter Morse and Fielder, Pujols, and Berkman. Its still pretty significant. All three are in Fangraph’s top tier while Morse is in the third tier. The difference? The left-handed bat and age. Perhaps as part of the contract they incentivize it to convince Fielder to lose weight and get in better shape? ;)
Ha, those weight clauses never seem to work… $100k doesn’t seem to keep them running in the off-season when they have $100 million in the bank, just ask Albert Haynesworth (sorry Skins fans, that was a cheap shot). But your point is incredibly well taken, Fielder (along with a legit leadoff man) makes this a very impressive lineup for the next few seasons, I just do not see how they fit him into a budget this year unless they drastically increase payroll, likely north of $85 million. The club could reasonably do so, but that would be a 30% increase in payroll, which rarely happens unless new ownership or a new stadium arrives.
Thanks again Peric for the kind words and for writing!
I think you need to revisit Mark Zuckerman’s CSN article on the new CBA and how the Nats lost all revenue sharing as a result of having a bottom third or fourth payroll. Goessling finally followed with his own analysis of this … a bit too little and very late. But he is off to Minnesoda and covering the original Nats as he always preferred.
The Nats will lose money unless they increase revenue.
1. With their TV/multimedia contract. The Lerners are getting ripped off by Angelos but every $$ counts. As each year goes by their percentage of ownership increases … not enough to offset the real earnings lost as a result of not owning all the media rights.
2. By putting more fannies in the seats at Nats park getting more game-of-the-week nationally televised games. How do you do this? By building a winner … not 1 year from now … not 2 years from now but RIGHT NOW. Thus Prince Fielder just as last year Ted Lerner personally attempted to persuade Zach Grienke to accept a trade.
Even without the so-called leadoff hitter, using Desmond and Lombardozzi, adding Fielder increases payroll … but not that much if you think about it … and it does not affect the plan which calls for building the team from within.
Adding Fielder is far and away more important than adding a lead-off man. Look at Espinosa’s stats displayed above …
Now let’s look at the Cardinal’s lead off spot.
wOBA bRAA
Rafael Furcal: .345 4.7
Danny Espinosa .331 6.1
Can Lombardozzi be as good? Perhaps. He hasn’t been tried there yet and unlike Desmond he is a switch hitter. As a UTL guy Lombardozzi could play an outfield position.
Looking at Ian Desmond who actually was far worse than
Danny Espinosa … even with his better batting average:
Ian Desmond:
wOBA = .310 bRAA = -5.4 below average!
Riggleman could have used Hairston there …
he was:
wOBA = .337 bRAA = 3.5
likely improved with Milwaukee.
But Riggleman didn’t.
Let’s check out a guy who strangely enough is a popular candidate for leadoff among the less than better informed fans on NatsInsider Coco Crisp:
wOBA = .323 bRAA = -2.3
Compare to Josh Willingham slower and mostly a DH?
wOBA = .364 bRAA = 17.7!
Okay so now let’s look at BJ Upton the GM’s true candidate?
wOBA = .345 bRAA = 9.6
He is clearly more effected by Park conditions. He hates playing at home and his stats dramatically reflect that! Nevertheless look at how much better they are than Crisp in spite of that!
Now let’s look at your excellent suggestion and I believe one of Rizzo’s favorite notions … but not as easily achieved via trade,
Peter Borjous:
wOBA = .355 bRAA = 12.7
Even better than Upton far better than Crisp.
But the point is one can see how huge an impact Fielder would have on the lineup even without the amazing lead off hitter? That is not to say it isn’t important as Nyger Morgan’s stats show:
wOBA = .359 bRAA = 14.2
Precisely what Rizzo was looking for when he acquired Morgan. If Johnson had been made manager sooner perhaps the Nats wouldn’t be searching for a CF at this point.